County Report · Mecklenburg (NC)

Mecklenburg: One Survey in Five Reaches Jeopardy

Charlotte's county is North Carolina's largest SNF market — and one of its most severe, with a 20.5% Immediate-Jeopardy rate driven by supervision and abuse failures that reach residents.

29Facilities
151Surveys
60IJ citations
20.5%IJ rate

Mecklenburg County — Charlotte — is North Carolina's largest nursing-home market: 29 facilities, 151 surveys, 805 citations. It is also one of its most severe. At 5.33 deficiencies per survey and a 20.5% Immediate-Jeopardy rate, roughly one Mecklenburg survey in five reaches jeopardy, and harm-level citations make up 10.8% of the total.

29
Facilities
151
Surveys
20.5%
Surveys with IJ
10.8%
Harm-level share
Mecklenburg runs above an already-high North Carolina on volume, harm, and Immediate Jeopardy alike.
Mecklenburg runs above an already-high North Carolina on volume, harm, and Immediate Jeopardy alike.
Mecklenburg at a glance: citation intensity versus the state, top tags, the A–L severity spread, and survey mix.
Mecklenburg at a glance: citation intensity versus the state, top tags, the A–L severity spread, and survey mix.

The local fingerprint

Accidents and abuse at the sharp end

Kitchen sanitation (F812) and infection control (F880, 1.38× the state rate) lead Mecklenburg's citation volume, and resident rights (F550) over-indexes at 1.35×. But the jeopardy mix is clinical: accidents (F689, 13 of 60 IJ citations — with hazard identification in every one and inadequate supervision in 86%), abuse and neglect (F600, 9), and quality of care (F684, 9). This is a county where supervision failures reach residents.

Failure modes inside Mecklenburg's top tags, the cross-tag systems behind them, and its 60 Immediate-Jeopardy citations by tag.
Failure modes inside Mecklenburg's top tags, the cross-tag systems behind them, and its 60 Immediate-Jeopardy citations by tag.
What Mecklenburg operators should drill

Supervision is the headline: for every high-risk resident, confirm the hazard is identified, the intervention is in place, and monitoring is documented (F689). Reinforce abuse prevention and reporting (F600), and hold quality-of-care review (F684). With one survey in five reaching jeopardy, Charlotte buildings should manage to the harm data, not the citation count.

Methodology. Mecklenburg figures are drawn from 151 county surveys within Clearpol's North Carolina dataset (2018–2026), cross-checked against statewide totals. Over-index ratios compare each tag's share of Mecklenburg citations to its share statewide.

Manage Charlotte buildings to the harm data

Clearpol flags Mecklenburg's repeat-risk facilities and the supervision and abuse failure modes behind them — before the surveyor does.

Book a demoExplore Insight Pro